The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 14/06/16 09:13, Adrian wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:07:37 +0100, tim... wrote:

UKIP was against it.
The only party with a leader that tells the truth.

"I'm going to resign now the election is over"

but he did

Well...
"I'm going to resign. I will. It's not an empty threat. Plead for me to
stay. Please? Umm, PLEASE? Oh, well, if you're going to be like that, I
won't resign."

(It's hardly his fault that the party doesn't have two ha'penny to rub
together to create a new credible leader)

And then he sacked the nearest there was to an alternative, just to feel
a bit safer.

Mind you, the average kipper wouldn't be particularly amenable to a
female party leader.

You would be suroprised.

Every time someone passed judegment on UKIP I have to rub my eyes and
wonder who this 'UKIP' is because its certainly not the party I've
been a member of for years.

And then I realise what people lie Adrian toss words like Xenophobe,
bigot, little englander around.

It's because that's what they themselves are.

Sacred to meet foreigners without the 'protection' of the EU.
Unable to see common sense 'our country first people without going
into an orgy of virtue signalling denial.
Stuck in some 1970s Little englander vision of england as a tiny
little country that cant survive without being propped up by germany...


That's because he's a remainer. Really, we should feel sorry for
him as he tosses his toys out of the pram!