View Single Post
  #545   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Muggles[_12_] Muggles[_12_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default Where should smoking be illegal?

On 6/8/2016 5:52 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 00:25:16 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 6/7/2016 12:57 PM,
wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:42:00 -0500, notX
wrote:

On 06/05/2016 07:02 PM, Muggles wrote:

[snip]

Not dangerous?? How do you know 10 times that amount isn't in a puff of
secondhand smoke?

Still the "one instance" fallacy? As if "one puff" is all there is.

[snip]

The preeminent safety organization in the government sets daily limits
for toxins and the concentrations in second hand smoke does not even
bump the needle. I gave the example of Chlorine, one of the deadliest
war gasses ever unleashed on mankind yet getting a little whiff when
you pour bleach into your washer is harmless and they put it in your
drinking water. Typical municipal water runs about 3ppm chlorine and
that is far higher than any of the toxins in cigarette smoke. How many
thousands of gallons of water do you use in a year?


Even one puff of tobacco harmful, reports surgeon general

he 704-page report, the 30th surgeon general's report to address
tobacco, "validates earlier findings, expands and strengthens the
science base, and describes in great detail the multiple ways that
tobacco smoke damages every organ in the body, resulting in disease and
death," according to its executive summary.

Tobacco smoke contains more than 7,000 chemicals and compounds,
including hundreds that are toxic and at least 70 that cause cancer,
according to the report. That means there is no "risk-free level of
exposure" to tobacco smoke. *Even a whiff of tobacco smoke* can
adversely affect the body, the report concludes.

"The chemicals in tobacco smoke reach your lungs quickly every time you
inhale, causing damage immediately," Surgeon General Regina Benjamin
said in a statement. "*Inhaling even the smallest amount of tobacco
smoke can also damage your DNA*, which can lead to cancer."

The lining of the lungs becomes inflamed as soon as it is exposed to
cigarette smoke, and, over time, the smoke can cause chronic lung
diseases such as emphysema and chronic bronchitis, according to the
report. *Even brief exposure to secondhand smoke can cause heart disease
and can trigger heart attacks*. Chemicals in tobacco smoke quickly
damage blood vessels and make blood more likely to clot, increasing the
risk for heart attacks, strokes and aneurysms.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...120905910.html



That sounds more like opinion than science.
If this was true ...
"Tobacco smoke contains more than 7,000 chemicals and compounds,
including hundreds that are toxic and at least 70 that cause cancer,
according to the report. That means there is no "risk-free level of
exposure" to tobacco smoke."

... It would not be safe to leave the oxygen tent because most of
those chemicals are present from other sources every day.
If you believe this bull****, maybe we should be talking about the
chemicals in a milk bottle.,

Bear in mind the SG is not a scientist, she is a political appointee



I also posted a second article that is a study with 26 extensive
references. Why'd you ignore it? This website contains studies related
to this topic, too. I'll post another one - see other post.


Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research
The Effect of a Single Cigarette Puff on Air Flow in the Lungs.

A puff of cigarette is estimated to contain 1016 oxidants. The degree of
smoking or smoke exposure can be ascertained by measuring the serum
levels of continine (a metabolite of nicotine)

Inhalation of cigarette puff has an immediate effect on respiration by
increasing airway resistance and therefore reducing the amount of oxygen
absorbed into the body.4

The present study was designed to examine the effect of cigarette puff
on lung function. It is unique in that it focuses on the acute response
to a single puff of cigarette smoker.

http://www.bioline.org.br/request?jm07001

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, PEFR was reduced after a puff of cigarette. Smoking
status influenced the PEFR value as smokers had substantially lower
values at the outset of the study. It is well known that from a puff of
cigarette, smokers move to a stick and then from sticks to addiction and
so the effects accumulate. The effect of tobacco smoking can be
deleterious. If a single puff increases airway resistance and reduces
PEFR, chronic smoking is bound to do much damage to the lungs.

References

-Bartel M. Health effect of Tobacco use and exposure. Monaldi Arch Chest
Dis 2001; 56: 545-550.
-Winstanley M, Woodward S and Walker N. Tobacco in Australia, Facts and
Issues. Austrl Ann Med 1995; 16: 31-40.
-Jaakkola M, Jaakkolan P, Ernst P, Becklate M. Ventilatory Lung function
in young cigarette smokers: a study of susceptibility. Eur Respir J
1991; 4: 643-650.
-Gold D. Wang XB, Wypij D, Speizer FE, Ware JH and Docey DW. Effects of
cirgarette smoking on lung function of adolescent boys and girls. N Engl
J Med 1996; 335: 931-937.
-Liston J. Breast feeding and the use of recreational drugs -alcohol,
caffeine, nicotine and marijuana. Breast-feed Rev 1998 (Aug 6); 2: 27-30.
-Pershagen G. Accumulating evidence on health hazards of passive smoking
(Review). Act Paediatr,1999 (May); 88(5): 490-520.
-Martinez FD, Cline M and Burrow B. Increased incidence of asthma in
children of smoking mothers. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 21-26.
-Polatly M, Erdinc M, Erdinc E. The early effect of smoking on
spirometing and transfer factor. Turk Resp J 2000; 1(2): 31-34.
-Iyawe VI, Igweh JC, Orie NN and Umapathy E. Time Course and
Bronchodilator effect of caffeine in young Nigerians. J Physiol Sci
1990; 6: 50-56.
-Josh LN, Hoshia VD. Effect of forced breathing on ventilatory function
of the Lungs. J Postgrad Med 1998; 44(3): 67-69.
-Reddy TS, Guleria S, Sanjeer S, Sharina SK and Pandy JK. Domestic
cooking fuel and lung functions in healthy non smoking women. Indian J
Chest Dis Allied Sci 2004; 46: 85-89.
-Kuperman AS and River JB. The variable effect of smoking on pulmonary
function. Chest 1973; 63: 655-660.
-Bosse R, Spabow D, Gawey AJ, Costa PT, Weiss ST and Rowe JW. Cigarette
smoking, aging and decline in pulmonary fuction -A Longitudinal study.
Arch Environm Hlth 1980; 35(4): 247 252.
-Chan-yeung M and DimichWard H. Respiratory Health effects of exposure
to environmental tobacco smoke. Respirology 2003; 8(2): 131-139.
-Hecht SS. Tobacco Carcinogens, their biomarkers and tobacco-induced
cancer. Nature Rev Cancer 2003; 4: 733-744.
-Mannino DM, Homa DM and Road SC. Involuntary Smoking and Asthma
severity in children. Chest 2002; 122(2): 409- 415.
-Femi-Pearse D and Elebute EA. Ventilatory function in healthy adult
Nigerians. Clin. Sci 1971; 41: 203-211.
-Ali MA. Racial differences in ventilatory functions. Nig J Physiol Sci
1990; 6: 59-62.
-Ebomoyi MI and Iyawe VI. Variations of peak flow rate with
anthropometric determinants in a population of healthy adult Nigerians.
Nig J Physiol Sci 2005; 20: 85-89.
-Alakija W, Iyawe VI, Jarrikre LN and Chiwuzie JC. Ventilatory function
of workers at Okpella Cement Factory in Nigeria. W Afr JMed 1990; 9(3):
187-192.
-Lew EA, Garfinkel L. Differences in mortality and longevity by sex,
smoking habits and health status. Society of actuaries Transaction 1987;
18: 24-28.
-Kucoks, Cokdenizr, Atmaca, Uyram I, Buhur A and Taskih O. The effect of
smoking on the glutathione levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Tr J
of Med. Sc. Tubitak 1999; 20:643-647.
-West JB. Respiratory Physiol The Essentials. 5th Ed. (Williams and
Wilkins, Baltimore) 1995; P.10.
-Zhu B, Enstrom JE and Kabat GC. Second hand smoke stimulates tumor
angiogenesis and growth.. Cancer cells 2003; 4: 191-196.
-Flintoft L. Carcinogenesis: Inhaling can seriously damage your health.
Nature 2003; 3: 800.
-Iyawe VI and Ebomoyi MI. Current developments in the physiology and
management of asthma. Nig J Physiol Sci 2005; 20:1929.


--
Maggie