On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 9:32:53 AM UTC-4, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 6/2/2016 6:55 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 6:47:27 AM UTC-4, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 6/1/2016 9:18 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 5:46:58 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:20:39 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
wrote:

On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 3:35:19 PM UTC-4, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2016 19:59:15 +0100, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 12:16:07 PM UTC-4, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2016 16:47:19 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 31/05/2016 16:42, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2016 15:10:59 +0100, JAS wrote:

JAS wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 11:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Harry K
wrote:

On Friday, May 27, 2016 at 10:22:26 AM UTC-7, trader_4 wrote:
On Friday, May 27, 2016 at 1:08:33 PM UTC-4, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2016 18:04:43 +0100, trader_4
wrote:

||
|| [christmas presents]


It is long since past time to trim some excess


Ok, I trimmed the old tect (sic) from your post.

What have you got against old tect? (sic)


Sure looks like you left a LOT of old tect.
About twenty lines of tect that don't really
need to be there. Makes it hard to get to the
new tect.


I'm confused. You included the "Christmas Tree" and then chastised me
for including it in my response. Do you determine the cutoff point
or do you simply live by a different set of rules?