View Single Post
  #158   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
[email protected] gfretwell@aol.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,141
Default Where should smoking be illegal?

On Sun, 29 May 2016 10:54:09 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 5/29/2016 10:34 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2016 10:02:57 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 5/29/2016 1:12 AM, rbowman wrote:
On 05/28/2016 09:57 PM, Muggles wrote:
It's not good to inhale carbon monoxide, or breathe in smoke from any
source. Our lungs weren't designed to inhale those things.

Well, I guess we had better cancel our normally scheduled August forest
fires.

That kind of smoke make people sick, too.

Fire fighters wear breathing equipment because that smoke isn't good to
breathe, either. People die from smoke inhalation, and they also have
similar physical responses to forest fire smoke that people have from
secondhand cigarette smoke.



OK fine, why aren't you campaigning to ban wood stoves, fire places
and back yard charcoal grills?


If you'd like to debate a different topic, start another thread. This
topic is about smokers and smoking, right?

Moving the goal posts and trying to change the subject doesn't change
the facts about smoking or secondhand smoke and it's dangers.

A neighbor can burn 40 pounds of wood in an evening with impunity but
if he is burning a gram of tobacco and you smell it, you go ballistic.


Your exaggerating my reaction. I don't go ballistic - I GET SICK from
secondhand smoke. Those are 2 separate responses. One is an emotional
response, and the other is a physical response that can't be controlled,
unlike an emotional response CAN be controlled.

Only tobacco smoke?
If not my point is valid.
The fact remains most of the compounds in tobacco smoke is also in
wood smoke.