"Chris Hogg" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 19 May 2016 19:36:12 +1000, "Rod Speed"
wrote:



"Chris Hogg" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 19 May 2016 08:15:32 +1000, "Rod Speed"
wrote:

Unless of course you know better than the people that run the scheme,
in which case you should tell them they've got it wrong.

What they say there is no different to what I said.

You are the one that doesn't understand what they were saying.

The entire system is a pump storage system because all
the dams are interconnected and it is only the oldest
dam, Burrinjuck, which has no way to move the water
that has got there back into the other dams.

ROTFLMAO!

You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag.

The whole point of the pumps at Jindabyne
is pump storage for the entire system.

The pumps at Jindabyne are much too small for that.

Bull**** they are.

They have a capacity of a mere 25.5 m^3/sec whereas the pumps
at Tumut-3, the only pumped storage system in the scheme,

More of your pig ignorant lies.

have a capacity of 297.3 m^3/sec, twelve times that volume,

Irrelevant to whether the Jindabyne pumps
are part of the total pump storage system.

and the pumps at Dinorwig, the scheme that you
belittled compared to the Snowy Mountain scheme,

More of your lies.

have a capacity of 384 m^3/sec, fifteen
time greater than those at Jindabyne
http://tinyurl.com/zrjoqd4 .

Irrelevant to whether the Jindabyne pumps
are part of the total pump storage system.

They have no other purpose, ****wit.