On Thursday, 19 May 2016 18:24:06 UTC+1, Graham. wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2016 10:04:14 -0700 (PDT), tabbypurr wrote:
On Thursday, 19 May 2016 17:44:04 UTC+1, John A Knight wrote:
replying to MM, John A Knight wrote:

http://www.scienceabc.com/pure-scien...aves-leak.html

That site's info re hole size & leakage is complete ballcocks.

Clearly the OP needed to buy a new microwave, but from an RF
perspective the information on that scienceabc.com page is actually
quite accurate.

The notion that there will be no leakage if a hole is 1% less than the wavelength is quite accurate?


NT