On 5/11/2016 1:45 PM, Bod wrote:
On 11/05/2016 19:30, Muggles wrote:
On 5/11/2016 12:56 PM, Bod wrote:
On 11/05/2016 18:43, Muggles wrote:
On 5/11/2016 12:37 PM, Bod wrote:
On 11/05/2016 18:12, Muggles wrote:
On 5/11/2016 11:43 AM, Bod wrote:
On 11/05/2016 17:32, Muggles wrote:
guess you have never looked into someone's eyes and
seen the love of God.

Many people won't look others eye to eye because they can see into
that
person's soul what they are going through, or what they are about.
Have
you noticed that people don't like looking at each other eye to
eye?

I always do. Autistic people have trouble in looking into peoples
eyes
though.
Only by looking into someone's eyes can you see their sincerity.

That's very true.

Wow!! we agree. :-)

Yeah! Now, that we agree that you can see sincerity in someone's eyes,
would you agree that you can see insincerity, too?

Of course.

Ok, would you define sincerity as good, and insincerity as bad, so you
could actually say you can see good or bad in someones eyes?

Yes and yes.

So, you agree that "good" and "bad" exist, right? Those are concepts
that are highly fluid and apply both the secular and spiritual mindsets.

If you agree that "good" and "bad" exist, at what point did you define
what qualifies as being either? A feeling? What other people taught
you? A sense of right vs. wrong? What influenced you to accept how you
would define either concept? Was it part of your training in the
Catholic schools that you did accept?

How can "good" and "bad" be separated as even being a secular or
spiritual mindset, or are secular and spiritual concepts directly related?


--
Maggie