"DarkMatter" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 18:55:55 GMT, "James Sweet"
Gave us:


"DarkMatter" wrote in
message
.. .
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 08:47:36 -0000, "rstlne" .@. Gave us:

It is if the rental place had a special 2 for 1 and he rented 30 ..
he could only watch 15, and he manged to copy another 15 during that
time

No, it isn't.

UGH
argue that..

You're retarded. Prove you aren't.

UGH
this aint court

You don't have the brains for a courtroom.

Sorry, dip****, but if you are too goddamned brainless to rent only
those that you can watch, then you should be using an etch-a-sketch.


Who intentionally rents more movies than they can watch? That's just
silly,
it'd be so much effort to copy a bunch of movies to watch later that only
a
fool would do it on a regular basis. Why are people even still arguing
this
crap? If you wanna do it, do it, you probably won't get caught, if you
do,
legal or not you'll spend more money and time arguing in court to save
your
ass than it's worth, now can we please get back on topic?

You're a goddamned idiot. It is not legal. Period.

Do you even know what a criminal mindset is?

BTW, the topic was copying DVDs, and telling lame ****s like you
that it is illegal IS on topic, you retard!

WTF? Did you even *read* my reply? I was supporting your side, but you seem
to be on a bit of a rampage, just drop it and take your childish insults and
bad language elsewhere, nobody who's still arguing even cares whether it's
legal or not, it's just a kiddie ****ing match.