In article ,
whisky-dave wrote:
the costs of a nuclear deterrent could be shared by
all members.

Which it hasn;t done and should which proves just how useful Eurpore
actiualy is when doing something important.

Of course many would question just how important a nuclear deterrent is.


But those who want out probably consider many of those
countries enemies anyway. ;-)

So why don't we have a nuclear detternt for europe paid for buy the EU
rather than the UK.

You want the EU to pay for something without the UK contributing?
Figures...

--
*IF A PARSLEY FARMER IS SUED, CAN THEY GARNISH HIS WAGES?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.