Jerry Greenberg wrote:

This can be a complicated issue.

There is more to the CRT than just the heater. When there is cathode
current, the ware is higher. There is a minimum cathold current when
there is no brightness on the screen. The tube has to be biased
slightly on all the time when working, even though it is in black.
When there is some luminocity on the screen, there is a greater amount
of cathode wear in the electron-gun.

Having a black screen saver will infact save some amount of catholde
wear. If you have a small image on the screen that is moving around,
this would introduce a bit more cathold current, but it would not be
the same amount as having a full screen of white.

I can understand this misundertanding... I was talking about that no picture
at all is worse than *a* picture. The help file of that screensaver said
that displaying a blank image for too long is bad for the filament. But the
CRT-faq on repairfaq.org seems to dissagree and somehow I put more fate in
the latter.

A topic for confusion by the way: I call an image blank when there is no
picture. Perhaps the author of that helpfile calls a white image blank...


The best solution is if the screen is not being used for about a 2 to
3 hour period, turn it off, or have the Windows power savings utility
turn it off. Cycling the monitor power on and off, can introduce a
greater stress on the support components, and the tube, rather than
simply leaving it on. This gets in to duty cycle statistics on the
wear of the electronics, and tube. This can get very complicated in
many cases.

For most electronics this might be true, but this seems to be a
misconception about monitors. You shouldn't power cycle to often of course,
but a few times a day is not so bad. A CRT wears down through use very
quickly. The disadvantages of leaving it on are greater than the
advantages.


The standard CRT should last about 30,000 hours. At this time factor,
the brightness output should be about 50% of the nominal. This figure
is with the brightness set to normal, and the contrast at about 50 to
70% of its maximum rage. If the monitor is used at about 10 hours per
day, it should last about 8 years.

In reality these monitors will last about 5 to 6 years. There are many
support components that can go wrong before the tube does. Cycling
the power off and on will also cause the monitor to fail quicker.
After about 6 years of normal use, many of the capacitors start to go
bad in monitors and TV sets. Then there are many other types of
components that can fail. Since most monitors, unless they are very
expensive and high end models, they are designed to not be serviced.
In the low to medium end monitors, many of the manufactures don't sell
the parts for out of warranty servicing.

I'm asuming that my Eizo monitor is one of high quality, so I expect to use
it for a while. With the color restoration feature, the brightness should
even stay constant.

BTW, do you know something about that color restoration feature? I may have
some troubles with it.


Enjoy the monitor. The way things are going obsolete these days, in a
few years, your monitor will be useless, and may have to be changed
anyways.

I hate that aspect of modern economy. Devices are designed to fail after a
few years, so the manufacturer will sell more...

--
To send me, Halfgaar, email, remove remove from my email address.