"harry" wrote in message
...
On Saturday, 12 March 2016 17:14:09 UTC, dennis@home wrote:
On 12/03/2016 07:58, harry wrote:
I see the gov. are bent on building Hinkley even though it's not
economically viable.
Another HS2 then.

We could just burn coal, however because of people like you we have to
reduce carbon emissions and the only way to do it reliably is nuclear
which you are stupid enough to oppose. You are putting the costs up but
you are too stupid to understand it.

The cost of electricity. was always going to rise. (Whatever the source).

That's bull**** with brown coal that has no other use
and with nukes done using established designs.

Which is why we have to be more efficient in using it.

Even sillier than you usually manage when its produced using
nukes whose costs are mostly capital and not fuel costs.