On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:03:27 -0600, "Terry Coombs"
wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:14:45 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

Ed, you are one kind soul to attempt to bring facts and reason into
this discussion. My take on the subject is that it is one of many
where regular Joes should best accept the collective wisdom of the
experts. I'm surprised that I'm still incredulous about small-brained
people having "beliefs" about complicated subjects they judge mostly
by irrelevant personal observations, anecdotes, and fringe web pages.
While digging into the details might be work, finding the
well-researched and well-accepted conclusions is easy. Those who
insist on putting their opinion above the science are frequently
birthers, etc. The willfully ignorant are hopeless and it's a sorry
state of affairs that so much energy is wasted trying to fix them.

Oh , so we ignorant children should just shut up and go play while our
"betters" decide what's best for us ?
Look asshole , just because I don't have a Phd behind my name doesn't mean
I'm stupid . I can read with good comprehension , and just because I believe
the sources that disagree with the ADMITTED LIARS doing research on global
warming doesn't mean I'm ignorant .

You don't know who the liars are, and it's unlikely that you have or
ever will have any way to know in your lifetime. The fact that you
"believe" in the 5 or 6 percent of climatologists who disagree with
the other 95%, in light of what you are unlikely ever to know, tells
the world that you aren't making a rational decision. You're either
indulging a conspiracy theory or you're going along with a tribe.

--
Ed Huntress