"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:00:54 -0500, "Jim Wilkins"
wrote:

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:45:22 -0500, "Jim Wilkins"
wrote:


You linked to a claim by a real climatologist that says the
evidence
of warming is almost impossible to explain without "anthropogenic
influences."


Are you faulting me for -not- suppressing evidence?

--jsw

Go back to my question: "What is your point?" The evidence in your
link is all in favor of AGW. You posted it in response to Larry's
anti-AGW comments and his bibliography of denial books. So I asked,
reasonably, if you had changed your position.

--
Ed Huntress

My position was never that AGW was false, you had to make it that to
be an easier target. I've been exposing the evidence tampering on the
pro-AGW side because I'd like to see this important matter
investigated impartially.

The Believer faction behaves as though dissent against AGW dogma is a
personal challenge to the image of superiority they awarded themselves
for demonizing the big energy companies.

--jsw