On 09/03/16 14:47, bert wrote:
In article , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes


It's standard fare. Eliminate all jobs where possible.
It's called productivity and the UK is seriously behind. That is the
problem with the idea that increased migration has improved the economy.
It may have increased GDP but there is no universal benefit unless
productivity is increased.
Apart from those
who decide what jobs there will be, of course. And anyone in a job - that
job is always essential.

The real point is that the classical analysis of Narx and the Left is
that Labour is necessary for wealth creation, and therefore that the
working man ought to share in that wealth. Or he might not work,.

Today, almost no human activity results in wealth creation, its all done
by machines, and there is no working class left, hence the morphing of
Leftism into heterosexual champagne socialists and scabby arsed Greens
and the like.

The Left is simply living in the Luddite past, dreaming of an impossible
future. To maximise wealth we want to eliminate labour as far as
possible. That solves the problem of wealth creation, but not wealth
distribution. And true to their inbred idiocy,. the Left has merely come
up with the idea of massive taxation + state as employer to relocate
wealth from where its made, to where its consumed by people who now have
no respect for it, and whose consumption can really not be tolerated
when they produce nothing of value.

I don't have an answer for this, but the point is, that the Left doesn't
even recognise the problem.



--
To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.