They finally found proof texting bans - does it make a difference
Mr Macaw wrote:
On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 06:37:22 -0000, Jamie Kahn Genet
wrote:
Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 05:15:02 -0000, Jamie Kahn Genet
wrote:
Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 03:58:35 -0000, Jamie Kahn Genet
wrote:
Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:16:32 -0000, Jamie Kahn Genet
wrote:
Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:39:37 -0000, Jamie Kahn Genet
wrote:
tlvp wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:16:49 -0000, Mr Macaw wrote, re
seatbelts:
... nasty crashes ... since those don't happen often
(especially in town driving), there's no point in wearing
one ...
... until just as a nasty crash takes place :-) . HTH.
Cheers, -- tlvp
Hopefully natural selection will do it's thing sooner rather
than later :-)
At town speeds it isn't nasty.
That must be why people die from crashes in town.
How much worse do you think a 70mph crash is than a 30mph one? If
you think 70mph with a seatbelt is ok, you must think 30mph without
one is ok too.
Why does any of that matter? You're a special snowflake, remember? :-)
Why am I trying to have an intelligent conversation with someone
with the mental age of 12?
I'm of above average intelligence, so this amuses me :-)
My IQ is 135. Seriously.
No, it is not. You lack logic and reasoning abilities required to have
such an IQ.
I have a lot of logic and reasoning. I don't think on emotions like most.
No. You're simply not very bright, as evidenced by your interactions
here.
--
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|