On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 21:39:09 -0500, Bill
wrote:

krw wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:01:51 -0500, Bill
wrote:

krw wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:34:52 -0500, Bill
wrote:

krw wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:04:17 -0500, Bill
wrote:

krw wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 21:37:36 -0500, Bill
wrote:

wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 10:40:36 -0500, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
I think most of us have had enough Fes-Spam.
It was an inside joke, Not a Festool promotion.
Some of us noticed and got a chuckle from it.
Those "some of us" have also known for sometime that B*** doesn't have
the faculty to get a chuckle from that type of comment.
If you don't already feel like something of an advertising "victim",
then I guess you can't relate.
I guess not. Your choice, though.

No doubt our individual tolerance levels
are different. New in the recent (local?) news is that, this year, the
"Indianapolis 500" will be the "Indianapolis 500, sponsored by
Pennzoil". Chuckle over that.

B***
Would you rather it be the "Pennzoil 500 from Indianapolis" or perhaps
the "Donald Trump 500"? ;-)
Just like our air and water quality, our animals and the earth. After we
take everything we can and sell it to the highest bidder, enjoy.... Go
to Flint, MI and get a drink of water...
Are you seriously comparing potentially toxic water to a little
advertising? Really?
Similar "greed" at the source of both, no?
Absolutely *NOT*. You morally equate feeding one's family by running
a grocery store with poisoning your neighbors for political gain.
That, sir, is called "Moral Relativity" at its finest!

Look at what the Internet
has become between the 1990s and now.
Hmm, in 1990 it was a toy. I can really make use of it now, and do.

It's almost like walking downtown
in NYC. I think that our "Inalienable Rights" might be updated to
include some "protection from marketers". I find it a new source of
"pollution". That you have currently found a good way to "hide" does
not, to my mind, eliminate the societal problem. YMMV.
You aren't adult enough to control yourself?
Yes. I can more than control myself.
Evidently not. You're always offended by something. It's consuming
you.
The only trouble maker here...

??

I don't have control over my
environment, unless I choose to stay home and stay of the roads. If
elected, I would make others respect the rights of others for a better
environment. Almost always, where there is a conflict between man and
nature, nature loses. I would try to change that. My values comes
before my pocketbook and I have the documentation to prove it.
"If I were king, you would obey *me*. You're a totalitarian (lefty).
Got it.

You need government to
infringe on other's rights, just to make your life worth living? Sad.
*Really* sad!