On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 11:03:34 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:45:43 -0500, "Robert Green"
wrote:

"DerbyDad03" wrote in message

stuff snipped

I wondered if they raised their own rates after paying themselves. Maybe
even cancelled their own policy. That would be so fitting!

More fitting is they denied they claim and THEN cancelled themselves!

More likely too given the exlusions I've see regarding flood damage.

(-:
Flood damage is interesting. Water over land is not covered without a
specific rider that you can not get for any price in flood prone
areas.

Wrong again. Flood insurance is available in most areas that are flood
prone, at least here in the USA.



Named perils doesn't cover any flood damage UNLESS it is specified.
Also known as specified perils.

All perils covers floods - except for over land -no insurance covers
"acts of war" and many don't cover "acts of God" unless specified
(lightning, wind, earthquake etc)

I'd like to see the many homeowner's policies that don't cover wind, the
house burning down due to lightning, etc. Earthquakes, yes. But I've yet
to see a homeowner's policy that doesn't cover the house burning down from
a lightning strike.