On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:53:10 -0000, Your Name wrote:

In article , Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:56:30 -0000, Ken Blake wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 19:07:54 -0700, Tony Hwang
wrote:
Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:36:04 -0000, tlvp
wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:16:49 -0000, Mr Macaw wrote, re seatbelts:

... nasty crashes ... since those don't happen often
(especially in town driving), there's no point in wearing one ...

... until just as a nasty crash takes place :-) . HTH. Cheers, -- tlvp

Can't, not at 30mph.

At 30mph, one cn get killed. Depends what the driver runs in to.

For example, if you have a head-on collision with another car going
30mph, that's a 60mph crash.

Oh no not another idiot who flunked physics. 30mph into an identical car
doing 30mph in the opposite direction is the same, PRECISELY the same, as a
30mph car into an immovable concrete wall. You decelerate from 30mph to 0mph
in the same time. Your kinetic energy loss is the same. The other car has
the same kinetic energy, but that goes to damaging him, not you.

Ah, your "degree" is from a cornflakes packet ... good to know. What a
completely brainless moron. :-\

Says the guy who put me in his killfile then replied to me straight afterwards!!! You're either stupid or a liar.

And if you think the physics I've written is wrong, feel free to correct it. Or go discuss it in a physics newsgroup and get laughed at.

--
Create instant designer stubble by sucking a magnet and dipping your chin in a bowl of iron fillings.