On Jan 23, 2016, Your Name wrote
(in article ):

In , Mr wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:36:04 -0000, wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:16:49 -0000, Mr Macaw wrote, re seatbelts:

... nasty crashes ... since those don't happen often
(especially in town driving), there's no point in wearing one ...

... until just as a nasty crash takes place :-) . HTH. Cheers, -- tlvp

Can't, not at 30mph.

You obviously have no understanding of physics nor the purpose of a
seatbelt ... likely because you're a stereotypical stubborn dumbass

Ill go along with that.

and American.

Naah! Now you are showing a particular antipodal bias which doesnt really
apply here as there is no real evidence of his nationality.

BUT, that's your choice and if you don't want to wear a seatbelt that's
up to you (depending on local laws). The only person who will get hurt
is you.

Yup! ...or fined.

There should be a "means test" in emergency medicine. Anyone who
decides to do something silly (not wear a seatbelt, climb a mountain,
etc.) either doesn't get treated for for injuries due to that silliness
*OR* has to pay the full expense of such treatment and rescue.

If the stupidity involves injuring someone else (e.g. hitting someone
because you're fiddling with a cellphone or driving drunk), then the
driver should not only have to pay for all services for themselves and
the other person, but also *permanently* lose their driving licence.

That seems fair.

--

Regards,
Savageduck