They finally found proof texting bans - does it make a difference
On Jan 23, 2016, nospam wrote
(in ) :
In news.com,
Savageduck wrote:
And the world stands shocked, both at your arrogance, and ignorance of
what a seatbelt in a car is primarily for :-D
It's for nasty crashes, what else? And since those don't happen often
(especially in town driving), there's no point in wearing one.
Except when you are rear-ended, or T-boned by texting fool.
seat belts don't matter in a rear-end collision because a person will
be pulled back into the seat.
There is inevitably a whiplash effect, which depending on the severity of a
rear impact can result in front seat passenger and driver impacting the dash
and/or steering column with potential head injuries. The airbags will not
usually deploy in a rear-ender.
with a t-bone side collision, it could go either way. a seat belt would
hold a person in place which could make things worse, or it could
prevent an ejection, preventing a worse outcome.
So, which is it? Better or worse?
From what I have seen, one is better equipped to survive an accident if a
seat belt is used.
BTW: This is where side curtain air bags can help reduce injuries.
a driver who is paying attention would be able to avoid either scenario.
Avoid being hit from behind by an inattentive asshole, or being T-boned by a
red light runner just by paying attention??
That just doesnt happen too often.
--
Regards,
Savageduck
|