They finally found proof texting bans - does it make a difference
In article , Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:36:04 -0000, tlvp wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:16:49 -0000, Mr Macaw wrote, re seatbelts:
... nasty crashes ... since those don't happen often
(especially in town driving), there's no point in wearing one ...
... until just as a nasty crash takes place :-) . HTH. Cheers, -- tlvp
Can't, not at 30mph.
You obviously have no understanding of physics nor the purpose of a
seatbelt ... likely because you're a stereotypical stubborn dumbass and
American.
BUT, that's your choice and if you don't want to wear a seatbelt that's
up to you (depending on local laws). The only person who will get hurt
is you.
There should be a "means test" in emergency medicine. Anyone who
decides to do something silly (not wear a seatbelt, climb a mountain,
etc.) either doesn't get treated for for injuries due to that silliness
*OR* has to pay the full expense of such treatment and rescue.
If the stupidity involves injuring someone else (e.g. hitting someone
because you're fiddling with a cellphone or driving drunk), then the
driver should not only have to pay for all services for themselves and
the other person, but also *permanently* lose their driving licence.
|