On 2016-01-23, Paul M. Cook wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:24:41 +0000, chris wrote:

They found a 7% difference which given the amount of data
they had was strong enough to be explained by the presence
or not a texting ban.

Being a logical thinker

You have proven you don't have a firm grasp on sound logic.

It's interesting that they couldn't find *accidents*

Repeating that lie doesn't make the accidents which you continue to
ignore magically disappear for the rest of us, foolish man.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR