On 2016-01-22, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:34:35 -0000, Jolly Roger wrote:

On 2016-01-22, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:21:52 -0000, Jolly Roger wrote:

On 2016-01-22, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:55:18 -0000, Jolly Roger wrote:

On 2016-01-22, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:46:56 -0000, Jolly Roger wrote:

On 2016-01-22, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:49:41 -0000, Jolly Roger wrote:

Mr Macaw wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:56:55 -0000, Jolly Roger wrote:

Mr Macaw wrote:

thickos like you

Personal insults. Not surprised. You lose.

No, an observation that you can't do a simple task like multitasking.

You haven't observed any such thing, liar. You lose.

You're the one that said it was true, did you lie?

You haven't observed my driving. You lose.

So you're admitting your claim was false?

Name the claim I made that was false.

You said it was scientifically proven that people cannot multitask.

Nope. You have a reading comprehension problem. Read what I actually
said again and get back with me. Or don't - I care not. Your trolls are
boring.

You've snipped it, paste it back in.

Go back and read it again. For someone who chides others for supposedly
being novices at Usenet, you sure seem ill equipped... *YAWN*

No, I'm just too lazy to spend time finding the post.

You're too lazy to read for comprehension too; so no surprise there.

**** off.

After you, bozo.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR