"Fredxxx" wrote in message
...
On 20/12/2015 22:27, Rod Speed wrote:


"Fredxxx" wrote in message
...
On 20/12/2015 21:56, Rod Speed wrote:


"Fredxxx" wrote in message
...
On 20/12/2015 17:14, Rod Speed wrote:


"Fredxxx" wrote in message
...
On 20/12/2015 14:01, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Fredxxx wrote:
On 20/12/2015 13:07, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
RJH wrote:
On 20/12/2015 08:44, charles wrote:
In article ,
RJH wrote:
On 19/12/2015 21:29, bert wrote:
In article , RJH
writes
If you understood what the bedroom tax is
.. you wouldn't call it a tax.

Well, it is a tax on people's homes.

No - it's limit on the amount of Benefit they receive.


. . . based on the size of their home.

No. Based on the number of bedrooms and those living in the
house.

You conveniently miss out the age aspect of those living in the
property.

I've not 'conveniently' missed out anything.

If you wish to give chapter and verse on what was remarkably
punitive
legislation, feel free.

My apologies, I was harsh. It gets my goat that because older
people
are more likely to vote, it's the younger people who get hit by
these
miscellaneous measures who just happen to be under 61.

Its actually the reverse in this case. Those hardest hit are those
whose
kids have moved out and who now have unoccupied bedrooms.

Precisely, except those who just happen to be over 60.

Its actually over Pension Credit age.

Which are the most likely age group with spare bedrooms.

The kids leave home MUCH earlier than that.

I can assure you not all children leave home before their parent(s)
are under 61.

Sure, most obviously with those that never married or moved out.

But that is rather unusual now.

I presume your family would have 4 generations in that time?

Guess again.

You're the one saying your "kids leave home MUCH earlier than that".

Don’t need to have anything like 4 generations in that time for that to be
true.