On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 21:23:55 +0000, dennis@home
wrote:

On 09/11/2015 21:09, mcp wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:21:53 +0000, dennis@home
wrote:

On 09/11/2015 19:59, mcp wrote:

The science hasn't changed significantly in the last 6 months and 99%
of scientists working in the field still dissagree with you.



You mean some of them disagree even though they get all their cash by
agreeing?

I see, we're back to it's a world wide conspiracy. They could get more
money out of the Koch brothers or BP although, as on the case of the
Berkley Earth Surface Temperature project, that doesn't always turn
out well for the deniers.


There are only one set of deniers, the climate scientists that keep
their methods and data secret. They are denying proper scientific review
by anyone that may disagree with them. It makes their science useless to
anyone that understands science as you can no longer trust them. They
may be correct but I will disregard bad science.

They keep their methods and data secret by publishing regularly in
peer reviewed scientific journals? Those that disagree with them
publish in right wing newspapers and online blogs with no scientific
review.