On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:09:04 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 12:55:59 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:47:01 -0700 (PDT), westom
wrote:

http://pml.nist.gov/spd-anthology/fi...es_happen!.pdf

That's the Martzloff document on surge protection written for NIST.
I showed you where he says:

Again trader4 has thrown things against a wall hoping something sticks. trader_4 keeps referencing citations that he did not read, did not understand, and that contradict his beliefs.

Just plonk the idiot so I don't have to see his drivel second and
third hand.


Clare, it figures that you'd return and take the wrong side of the debate.
Not surprising, given that you're wrong on electrical issues about 80%
of the time. Your forte is making up code requirements that don't exist.
But in this case, since I *supported* you, I would hope that you would have
some better sense. YOU had started this debate with the BS WTom posted.
I came in later supporting what you posted. And now, you're dumb enough
to again attack me? Good grief.
And almost everyone here knows WTom and his BS history going back years.

And finally, if you can't follow the posts, don't want to participate, how
hard is it to just skip the thread? Here's a thought. Go **** yourself.