Ophelia wrote
tim..... wrote
Ophelia wrote
Dave Plowman (News) wrote
Ophelia wrote

They are free to take him to court and wear his costs when he
shows that he did use the store when he parked in their car park.

How pleased do you expect the court to be when you could have produced
your receipt for proof before it got that far?

I'd be happy to produce the receipt if they send someone here to
examine it.

What I'm not going to do is be put to any inconvenience for something
which is in no way my fault.

One would hope they would ask to see the evidence before they went down
the court route.

They presumably have all the evidence that they need

1) proof that he parked there
2) proof that he didn't register his reg at the checkout as required

(subject to all the signage etc being correct)

they need no more evidence that this

Quite! If they have asked for his evidence that he was a customer and he
refuses to provide it,

No he has not. He has said that he is happy
for them to show up at his place and look
at or take a photo of the till slip.

turning up in court with it isn't going to go well for him.

It's never going to get to court, you watch.

And even if it did because some complete bone head in
Lidl insists on that, the court will be royally ****ed off that
Lidl is wasting the court's time when they were free to show
up at Dave's if they believe that he is lying about having
used the store at that time and are too stupid to ask him
to tell them the transaction number on the till slip by email.