Thread: Lidl parking
View Single Post
  #444   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
Norman Wells[_5_] Norman Wells[_5_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 472
Default Lidl parking

"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
Norman Wells wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Norman Wells wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Norman Wells wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Norman Wells wrote
Harold Davis wrote


How long a period of parking are you buying for the additional "charge",
colloquially referred to as a "fine"? Is that specified on the "contract"?


When you park, you are deemed to accept the conditions on whatever notices
are displayed prominently in the car park.


Its not that black and white with unreasonable conditions.


The conditions may be unreasonable. The only time they're unenforceable is
if they're entirely unconscionable.


That is not correct.


You'll find that it is.


No I will not.


If you bother to do even some elementary searches.


Don’t need to do any search at all to know that if the
conditions say that you can only park there if you are
wearing matching sox, that that condition is unenforceable.


It would be, actually.


Nope.

Say why you think otherwise.


You made that claim, you get to do the saying.

You do not contract to hand over your first born if
you don’t actually use the store as well as the carpark.


If you park there, you're accepting the terms and conditions displayed.


Nope, you are free to park there knowing that a
particular condition is not enforceable or is illegal.


You have such a poor grasp of the principles that your 'knowing' a particular
condition is not enforceable is of very dubious provenance indeed. I wouldn't
believe you for a moment.


Doesn’t matter what you believe. What
matters is what is enforceable and legal.


And that's what I've told you. It's not a matter of 'belief' but of knowledge.


You haven't established that yours is knowledge.

Any charges displayed are legally enforceable.


Wrong.


Yes they are.


Nope, not when they don’t spell out clearly
under what circumstance the charge is due.


Which they invariably do of course.


Must explain why the courts have tossed out some claims.


Such as?


The ones they have tossed out for that reason.

Your having to invent ever more ludicrous scenarios to support your argument is
a clear indicator that you don't in fact have one.


Must explain why the court have tossed out some claims.


Such as?


The ones they have tossed out.


I can't educate pork.

Goodbye.