Thread: Lidl parking
View Single Post
  #413   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
Ophelia[_11_] Ophelia[_11_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61
Default Lidl parking



"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
Norman Wells wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Norman Wells wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Norman Wells wrote
Tim Streater wrote
Norman Wells wrote
Harold Davis wrote


How long a period of parking are you buying for the additional
"charge", colloquially referred to as a "fine"? Is that specified
on the "contract"?


When you park, you are deemed to accept the conditions on whatever
notices are displayed prominently in the car park. By parking
there, you enter into a legally binding contract, the terms of
which are those conditions. Any charges displayed are legally
enforceable. That includes any charges for overstaying your
welcome, parking in the wrong way etc etc.


That may or may not be true, IANAL. But if so, it would still
require
the parking cpy to take action by taking you to court. Small Claims
Court or perhaps County Court. It's then up to them to prove that
you haven't complied with the conditions.


Hardly difficult.


Very difficult to prove that you didn’t use the shop when you used the
carpark.


That depends on what exactly the displayed conditions were.


Nope.


They determine what has to be proved, and where the burden of proof
lies.


Nope. The basic law on proof still applys.


They still have to prove that you didn’t comply with the conditions.


Which might include, for example, retaining your receipt from the shop,
or producing it on demand.


But it doesn’t.

If they do, the burden of proof that you used the shop shifts to you.


Nope.

Parking attendants all over the country do so successfully all the
time.


Lidl doesn’t have any of those.


Someone must have tried to impose the parking charge.


The operation that Lidl gets to run their car park.


Doesn’t necessarily involve any attendant at all.


Even the bluff letters can be completely automated.


They're not 'bluff letters'.


Corse they are. Dave is under no legal obligation to prove anything.

They are free to take him to court and wear his costs when he
shows that he did use the store when he parked in their car park.


How pleased do you expect the court to be when you could have produced your
receipt for proof before it got that far?




--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/