"tim....." wrote in message
...

"michael adams" wrote in message
...

"tim....." wrote in message
...

"michael adams" wrote in message
...

"Jethro_uk" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 14:11:23 +0100, michael adams wrote:


"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
[quoted text muted]

There's plenty online, especially in local groups, of people who've
ignored these demands and simply thrown them away without any
consequences at all.

Dangerous advice, post Beavis. *Probably* what would happen. But the
courts have allowed it now.

As it happens I wasn't advising the OP to do anything. I was simply making
an observation.

Any advice on offer would have been in the webpage to which I left a link


http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/c...going-far.html


As to Beavis I'm not aware of any judgement being made,
and in any case with Beavis, there is no disagreement as
to fact.

Beavis has been found in favour of the parking company at the appeal court, as such
is precedence creating and applies everywhere (in England)

The Supreme count have heard Beavis' (2nd) appeal and the world is awaiting their
response.

That's what I just said, above.

no you didn't

you said:

"As to Beavis I'm not aware of any judgement being made"

Which is correct. The judgement in question is the one
which is yet to be announced upon which people can base
their future conduct.

Nobody is going to base their conduct on judgements
which have been appealed; and which from that moment on
are reduced to total irrelevance.

The first page of hits on google for "Beavis" "parking" mainly
features appealed judgements concerning his case. Or are you unaware
of that fact ?


michael adams

....




tim