On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 15:59:32 UTC+1, The Todal wrote:
On 07/10/2015 15:51, whisky-dave wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 15:33:06 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
They don't consider the lower paid to be workers, though. The working
class to them is manager to board level. Anything below that servants.


Are you Scottish.
No, just a chippy lefty****.

Notice neither of you wanted to refute my statement so take it you agree
with it. No surprise there.

Wonder why so many on here don't just come clean and be honest that they
want the low paid to remain low paid?

Well of course w ewant the low paid to remain low paid that's why we import from abroad and ignore those that are illegal because we can pay them less than anyone else.

But there will always be low paid we just don't want it to be ourselves..





The low paid are low paid for a reason, they made the choice not to get
a decent education and move up the pay scale.

That's not always true.
I know someone that works in social care mostly the ederly he believe that
even though he works xmas day cleaning **** up and having to walk a few miles for £7.20 an hour he feels like he's done some good in the world.
he has an NVQ 3 in social care.


A £1000 gets you close to getting a cat D licence,

and what use is that.


tax credits and
bull**** benefits are the reason why this country is a country full of
lazy dingos.

No it's why we full of useless ****wit senior managment paying themselves a fortune for doing little of any use to anyone but themselves.



Mind you a iphone 6 and a sat dish cost that Much, Its a no brainer, do
sweet fa about you circumstances and get benefits.

Or get the benefits stopped and moan like a fat ugly scotch ****.