"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 06:00:46 UTC+1, harry wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 20:23:21 UTC+1, Timothy Murphy wrote:
sm_jamieson wrote:

Interesting interview where she defends sending her son to a
fee-paying
school despite her views on Comprehensive schooling:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...private-230293

She was right to put her family before her party.

As Graham Greene said, "If I had to choose between my country and my
friend,
I hope I would choose my friend".

I bet he was a socialst too.
Bliar send other people to fight his illegal war in the Middle East.
Not his own family/friends.

I never considered Blair a socilaist.

More fool you. He was with quite a bit of stuff.

Even Cameron is with some stuff too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_BlairBlair
declared opposition to the traditional
conception of socialism,

But did nothing about some of the very obvious
socialism that Britain has had for a hell of a long
time now like the NHS, government schools, the
absolute vast bulk of the roads etc etc etc.

and declared support for a new conception
that he referred to as "social-ism"

Just more utterly silly political bull****.

What makes you think he was.

He did nothing about some of the very obvious
socialism that Britain has had for a hell of a long
time now like the NHS, government schools, the
absolute vast bulk of the roads etc etc etc.

Ok for them to be killed and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
All to feed his socialist principles, lies and vanity.
Anybody that votes socialist subscribe to these "principles" is a
scumbag'

Socialists have no principles except to rob those that work and bribe
those that don't.