On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 12:57:59 UTC+1, whisky-dave wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 02:20:39 UTC+1, wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 September 2015 21:46:31 UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:
On 22/09/2015 11:23, whisky-dave wrote:

Using film gives an better apprecaition as to what real photography
is rathe rthan just taking a snap shot.

I disagree.

it gives a better appreciation of what obsolete photography was like, how bad it truly was compared to digital.

There's no such thing as obsolete photography.

There's a long string of obsolete photographic processes and equipment. Anyone with ay familiarity at all with photography will be somewhat familiar with daguerrotype, blueprint and various others. Film has well & truly joined that list. That its now the darling of art colleges changes nothing.


NT