On Friday, 11 September 2015 20:36:55 UTC+1, Rod Speed wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Just because some addict claims something...

They'll say to a man that attending meetings
is essential to maintain their recovery.

Hardly surprising, the ones that don't believe
that don't bother to go to those, stupid.

So you don't want to hear from those in recovery.

Yep, what matter is how many of them never use
whatever they used to use, again. Sweet **** all.

Then you could never talk to anyone ever about recovery.

What matters is what can be established using rigorous
science, not what some ****wit addict claims.

Thought I'd put back in the bit you snipped.

I snipped it because

because you're really dumb and couldn't reply.





Thought even you might see the flaw in this?

There is no flaw, just you lying thru your teeth,

then prove it.




According to AA's 2014 membership survey,

The technical term for that is 'completely useless self reporting'
Where as yuor techincal rproting is lying yuor way out of a paper bag.


27% of members have been sober less than one year,
24% have 1-5 years sober, 13% have 5-10 years, 14%
have 10-20 years, and 22% have more than 20 years sober.

Pity there is no definition of what constitutes sober,

Pity you have the brain to test you theory

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=so...e-GMjbU-3llpAC

and no testing to see if they are lying at all.

you can use chemical testing like they do in sport.
You've always claimed you can tell when someone is completely blotto,
what do you call some one thast isn't blotto then ?



Now AA have some 2 million members world wide,
so about a half million having long term sobriety

You have absolutely no idea how many lied about that.

Niether have you, so it could be zero.