Thread: Faraday cage?
View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
David Billington[_2_] David Billington[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 311
Default Faraday cage?

On 02/09/15 01:22, Joe Gwinn wrote:
In article , Tom Gardner
wrote:

See ads for wallets that prevent skimming credit cards? Are those
considered Faraday cages? I was thinking I could laminate some AL foil
the size of credit cards and have one on top and bottom of the stack of
cards in my wallet to do the job. Sound feasible?

Credit cards require physical contact, be it swiping the magnetic
stripe or communicating with the chip within. Neither is RFID, and so
cannot be skimmed from a distance.

Passports are quite another matter. They very much can be read from
ten or twenty feet. I'm not sure how important it is to prevent this,
but a sheet of 0.003" thick brass shimstock foil folded into the
passport completely prevents this. This costs maybe a dollar.

It is not necessary to enclose the passport. So long as the foil is
close to the antenna coil in the passport, it shorts the local field
out quite well.

If the foil is not removed, not even the legit reader at passport
control works. The officers at passport control do not get excited
about this - just remove the piece of shimstock, and put it back in the
passport later.

Joe Gwinn

Maybe in the US this true but I doubt it, contactless payment technology
has been around in the UK for a few years at least and I would expect in
the US as well, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contactless_payment ,
and has been in the news in recent days here as they are raising the
limit for this type of transaction to £30, previously £20 IIRC. I don't
have one and not sure if I want one. A few years ago I was warned by
friends in Holland about IIRC Oyster card travel payment cards being
scanned while in your pocket and details/funds being withdrawn.