On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 12:15:45 AM UTC-4, ceg wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:38:04 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote:

I don't see any reason to challenge the basic accident rates as
accurate enough for this discussion.


"Data are estimated. Year-to-year comparisons should be made with caution."

There from your own data source, talking about the accident numbers,
is your reason.