On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 6:13:57 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:20:30 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Saturday, July 11, 2015 at 9:33:20 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:


You need to stick to the facts. This had nothing to do with them
refusing to go to their reception. It was pure bigotry based on
religion. They refused to sell a cake to a lesbian couple. Just as in
the south in the 50's businesses refused to do business with Blacks.
They violated the law. It's that simple.

http://m.snopes.com/2015/07/03/sweet...lissa-damages/

From your own source, the judge said they refused to provide
"wedding cake services". Typically, wedding cake services include
delivering the cake, setting it up at the reception. I took it
to mean it was more than just picking up a cake, so you might be
right on that point. But to me it doesn't matter. And where is your
lib outrage at the illegal, unconstitutional gag order the court
put on the bakers?

He didn't put a 'gag order' on them. He did limit their ability to
tell lies.

Cute. Real cute. You obviously need to read the first amendment.
It's not up to you, a court, or anyone else to decide what "lies"
are. All the couple was saying is saying what their religious beliefs
are, that they think being homo is a sin, etc. It's really, really
shocking how the radical libs want to force people to conform to their
ways. BTW, the couple is not following the gag order.