View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Sid in Sacramento Sid in Sacramento is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Good Replacement for older, T-12 96 inch light bulbs ??

replying to James, Sid in Sacramento wrote:
jnipperxxx wrote:

I have a four-bank system of 96 inch light bulbs in my kitchen dropped
ceiling, with each bank having its own old-style oil-based ballast. These
are 60 watt bulbs.
I have read some about the newer, electronic ballasts, and I can see their
advantage. I see common comments about T-8 bulbs , to replace T-12's.
Most of what I read about T-8 bulbs, say that they replace the T-12, with a
bi-pin base. But, the bulbs that I have now (the T-12) don't have a

bi-pin
base, they have a bigger, single pin base, about the size of a pencil
eraser.
I have several questions:
1. Is there a T-8 bulb that is rated at 60 watts??
2. Do they make the T-8 in the 96 inch size?
3. Is there a T-8 with the type of base that I have described (not

bi-pin),
so that I could use my existing fixtures ??
4. My goals are to get equally good or better lighting in my kitchen (I

now
use a total of 8 60 watt bulbs); have better, quieter, longer lasting
ballasts; and have longer lasting bulbs.
5. Any othe words of advice about what I should use if I want to improve
this lighting system ??
----------------
Thanks for any advice !!
--james---



The cheaper the ballast, the noisier they are. If you really want to save
money, and if your lights are in an enclosed space with frosted plastic
cover, you might want to look at LED lights to put in place of the tubes ?
MHO

--