On 5/15/2015 11:49 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 5/15/2015 9:47 PM, Meanie wrote:

I don't have a problem with his troubles being over. **** his 72 virgin
belief and **** the rest of those piece of **** mooslums. I don't like
my tax dollars, already being spent foolishly by the piece of ****
politicians, keeping assholes like this alive. If you want to keep his
troubles alive, I don't care, just do it on someones dime other than
mine.

So you'd rather they spend even more of your money to try to kill him.
Many studies have shown it cost more to give the death penalty than life
in prison. You can thank a lawyer for that.

If they carried out the death sentence that same day it is given, I'd
agree with you. Takes 10 to 20 years, if ever.

That's the problem....that expense stems from the appeals process
involving attorney fees and court fees. It sure isn't the cost of prison
in itself.

When I say kill the SOB, that means swift. I'm even willing to allow (as
if it's my choice) one appeal, then a swift execution. This 10 to 20
year ordeal on death row is pure bull****.

Overall, we shouldn't have to favor life in prison over execution due to
the incompetency of the system. Laws need to be changed to reduce the
high cost of a death row inmate. Only then do I believe it will truly be
a deterrent.