The cellphone paradox - where are all the accidents?
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:46:35 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote:
I've elaborated on that very question earlier in this thread. The
short version is that most of the 'studies' are crap designed to prove
cell phones are dangerous thru a variety of nonsensical study
protocols. You want to prove pianos are dangerous? Do a study where
one person puts their head under the upraised and held in place by the
stick "hood" of the piano then simulate a magnitude 6 earthquake.
You'll find pianos to be quite dangerous.
I have to believe you.
The *one* statistic I would believe is overall accidents.
All the rest seem to be fabricated with an agenda in mind.
The funny thing is that they make the paradox even worse.
I can't be the only person to notice this though.
|