On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 8:49:18 PM UTC-4, Captain Obvious wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:32:48 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote:

On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 5:31:03 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

Mute Banquer must respond!

Respond to what? jon doesn't have to respond to NOT being convicted in a court of law.

What part of "NOT" don't you understand? Ignorant people like you have to first understand the law. Anyone or any group can pressure a federal or state investigator to bring charges and take a particular person to jail while trying to trump up charges and an eventual conviction.

But is the person ever found guilty or not. I don't care how many people dislike the person, try to focus here. Cut out the typical half-brained assumptions.

Was jon convicted in a court of law? If you can finally think for yourself, you'll see that jon was NOT convicted in a court of law. Get over it. You lose.

==================================================
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." - Mark Twain