On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 06:31:27 -0400, "Jim Wilkins"
wrote:
"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 21:33:55 -0400, "Jim Wilkins"
wrote:
"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 07:42:19 +0700, John B.
wrote:
I think the best thing to say about it at this point is that you
and
Jim are good examples of why I got out of engineering school after
two
years. g I'll leave you to judge that, but the accurate thing is
that I didn't like the mechanistic perspective.
Did you do quick-draws with your log-log duplex decitrig slide
rules
in the hallway? Seeing that was the thing that pushed me over the
top.
d8-)
It's a different world view. And it is consuming. And it is
inherently, irredeemably reductive.
I'm thankful that I can get a thrill out of the whole idea.
--
Ed Huntress
You scorn when I quote hard science, and equally when I quote epic
poetry. Where is your little comfort zone in between them?
I don't think I've scorned any genuine, hard science. I don't recall
your quotes of epic poetry. Although I enjoy some of the great epic
poems, I would not, personally, quote any of them to make a point of
any kind I can think of.
If you've noticed, 90% of what I scorn is scornfulness.
--
Ed Huntress
On 6/15/2015 at 10:38PM you responded:
/*
These were once considered appropriate for the 6th grade:
http://www.bartleby.com/360/7/158.html
"Appropriate" for what? Background noise?
*/
That wasn't scorn for "Horatius at the Bridge." That was scorn for the
idea that it was "appropriate" for the 6th grade -- ever.
--
Ed Huntress