"Capitol" wrote in message
...
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article3NGdndypBJUmD0XInZ2dnUU78KGdnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk,
wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In articleK7WdnR7LhfWY7kXInZ2dnUU78fednZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk,
wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In ,
wrote:
A while back I was talking to the manager of the Exmouth branch. She
told me that they do not employ anyone under 60. Far more reliable
in
their experience.

And likely cheaper. Working for beer money.


Ah, I see, your usual antipathy for people who actually are prepared
to
work.

And your usual knack of being unable to see the point.

BTW, why aren't you at work? Last we heard you worked 24/7. Or was that
just another lie?


Some of us worked hard enough to be able to retire and only work at DIY.

And those tend to be the sort that B&Q employ. Retired on a pension and
simply want something to occupy their time. Nothing wrong with that of
course, but it does allow them to pay wages a younger person couldn't
live
on.


B & Q wages are not age dependent. They also employ young people.

I assumed he meant that an "old person" couldn't live on it either, but
because they also have a pension, they don't need to

tim