On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:46:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:24:31 +0100, Santo Brown wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 20:00:48 +0100, Santo Brown
wrote:



"DerbyBorn" wrote in message
2.222...
Thinking of getting one as support in cases of accidents.

IMO you need an invisible one so that if the accident
was your fault, you can just not mention it.

Just remove it quickly and hide it.

Easier said than done, particularly if it's a serious accident
and you can't get to it because you aren't free to move.

Can't say I've ever had one of those.

But they obviously do occur.

Too rare to worry about.

Makes more sense to have an invisible one so that
no one except you knows that there is one in your car.

The invisibility cloak has not yet been invented.

It isn't hard to have the lens so that it isn't obviously a camera lens.

Where would you place it?

And it makes sense for it to be able to do everything,
provide you with a record of who broke into your car
too and who side swiped it when it was parked or ran
into the back of your car.

Perhaps.

No perhaps about it.

But the majority of the time it was someone hitting you when you were
driving.

But it makes more sense to have the cameras do it all

I only need it for the most likely thing.

and be a reversing camera and parking camera as well.

Only if you're **** at those things.

I find with the modern cars that slope very sharply at the
front, it isn't at all clear just where the front of the car is
when parking so it would be useful to have the cameras
help with that as well.

I don't seem to have this problem. Just lean forwards.

--
What does a Polish woman do after she sucks a cock?
Spits out the feathers.