On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 23:03:45 +0100
Graham. wrote:

On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 14:11:30 +0100, Davey
wrote:

On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 05:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Martin Bonner wrote:

If this is the case, the owner of the account owes Sky,

Err, no.

Why not? If a film was downloaded using the Sky service, then the
account owner owes Sky for that download.
Who downloaded it is of no consequence.

I have no love of Sky, but why is this not the case?

Because you have misunderstood the issue.
Sky in this case was an Internet service provider, not a broadcaster
or content provider.



See my post of 18:21 yesterday.
--
Davey.