View Single Post
  #49   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Windmill[_5_] Windmill[_5_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 474
Default (Adam?) IET 17th Amendment 3 Jan 2016 - Non flammable CUs

nemo writes:

On 26/07/2015 20:40, Tim Watts wrote:
http://electrical.theiet.org/wiring-...nits/index.cfm

outlines new requirements from Jan 2016 for either using CUs made on non
combustible material or enclosing in a "non flammable" enclosure.

Have the NICEIC (or anyone else) offered guidelines on what a non
flammable enclosure means?

eg would use of Euroclass B/C fire resistant plywood meet the regulation?


As an aside, here's an extract from the justification for the new
requirement:
"The cause of the fires investigated was almost invariably found to be
resistance heating as a result of poor electrical connections due to
poor workmanship or lack of maintenance."


Seems to me it will take a lot of effort to put in place regs to ensure
that *all* parts of any electrical installation are proof against
incompetent installers.


My limited experience suggests that it may be worthwhile to
periodically check the tightness of *every* wiring connection in a
house. Haven't seen many examples of overheating, but have come across
quite a few connections which seemed to have become less than tight.


--
Windmill, Use t m i l l
J.R.R. Tolkien:- @ S c o t s h o m e . c o m
All that is gold does not glister / Not all who wander are lost