On 01/08/15 15:05, ARW wrote:

Actually I am now not so sure your CU would meet the 3rd amendment regs.



Why's that Adam?

It's not combustible. Granted it will not contain fire (large openings
in the rear, no itumescent seals) - but as far as I can follow from the
IET wibblings none of that is required.

It does not matter because my CU predates next Jan, but I am interested
in your theory as the sub-CU I will add later will need to comply.