On 7/31/2015 9:57 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/07/15 20:43, dennis@home wrote:
On 31/07/2015 13:50, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/07/15 13:18, bert wrote:
In article , The Natural Philosopher
writes
On 31/07/15 11:18, John Rumm wrote:
(iii) In the server space, Unix won overwhelmingly.

True, but not really relevant to the consumer.

very relevant. It demonstrates that where stability and speed matter,
you don't pick windows


Don't most bank's cash machines run on XP?

Well exactly.

Stasbility and speed wasn't seen as a primary requirement



Yet they are almost always working and when they aren't its usually the
server that's down (running linux?).

Dennois. You have a problem. You are clutching at any straw to defend
windows the way Harry defends renewable enertgy.
Let me gues: you are a certified lunatic^H^H^H^H^HMicro**** support cl0ne

No, we are just shining the light of the real world under the dusty
bridge inhabited by the linux trolls.





--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/