On 19/07/2015 10:08, Rod Speed wrote:


"harry" wrote in message
...
On Saturday, 18 July 2015 13:19:11 UTC+1, dennis @ home wrote:
On 18/07/2015 07:31, harry wrote:
On Friday, 17 July 2015 10:18:28 UTC+1, Tim Streater wrote:
In article 45398ca9-e8e3-499a-bf62-

All depends on azimuth, roof angle and shading.
My installation is near perfect in all these respects.
The house was purchased with this in mind.
The installation is almost three and a half years old and will
have paid for itself in five years.

Only because you are indulging in legalised banditry on the rest
of us.

Ah. Another whinging socialist.


Would you have fitted panels if they didn't make you a large profit?
Obviously someone that cared about the environment and believed AGW was
a threat would have.

You aren't honest enough to admit you did it for the cash and sod all
else. Its why I installed cavity wall insulation 30 years ago as it
saved cash not because it saved the planet.

Both.
Renewable energy is the sensible way to go.

Nope, not for heating.

Only the brain dead can'tseethis.

Only the brain dead can't see that the cost of
renewable energy makes it unviable for heating.

Direct solar for DHW might make sense, particularly if no mains gas and
on well insulated new build.