"Scott M" wrote in message
...
Huge wrote:
On 2015-06-07, Jim at the Common Riding
wrote:
"Adrian" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 16:24:44 +0100, Jim at the Common Riding wrote:

what are the real world problems on switching between the recommended
5w
30 synth blend oil and 10w 40 mineral oil in a car? I want to use up a
load of 10w 40 mineral oil in it. What is likely to go?...Bearing in
mind it will only be used for six months in the summer.
Depends on the engine.

Viscosity-wise, some - especially those that require thin oils like
5w30
- can have all sorts of problems if used with thicker oil.

Base-stock-wise, again depending on the engine, there shouldn't be any
great difference between mineral and semi-synth, except you'll want to
change it more quickly. If it's a turbo, though, I really wouldn't -
the
heat of the turbo may very well cause it to carbonise in relatively
short
order.

For the price of even five litres of mineral (so cheap) oil, why risk
it?
Just chuck it on freecycle or in the lawnmower or even take it down the
tip.
but I have 50L of it !!!

the engine is a 3.8 V6 ford essex (canada) manufactured 1995 and is
prown to head gasket failure ...... Perhaps I shouldn't risk it
then...ta

The Ford 'Essex' is a dark ages technology engine, and I'm amazed anyone
thinks it needs synthetic oil.

5w-30 became the recommended for *all* Ford & subsidiary (Jag/LR etc)
engines in the 90s in the wake of sticky lifters (or something) on the
Zetec engines. As you say I bet the 3.8 was designed for
mineral/semi-synth 10w-40 rather than fully synth anyway. Certainly can't
see it being phased by it.

Scott

very reassuring...thanks...yes it has two camshafts in the block...none of
this modern stuff .....no rubber cam belts...tee hee